curiositync's Blog

These comments show just how out of touch Senator McCain and Senator Clinton are with the reality of what's happening in this election.

We've built the broadest campaign of ordinary people in the history of presidential politics -- and more people across this country have voted for Barack Obama than either one of them.

Did you know that?  I didn't.  I didn't even know we had had an election.  I'm registered to vote, and we didn't have any election that I know of... 

Evidently Barak claims he doesn't accept any funds from the Oil Companies... but doesn't tell anyone he DOES accept monies from oil executives.  To the tune of over $225,000... naughty boy, Barak?  Get honest here... you been lyin' here...

 Democratic Debate:  how come the democrats blame the Bush government for failed stuff... when the democrats are in the majority?  when the democrats are running the government?  I don't understand how come they are blaming President Bush when it's their Congress that is passing all of the liberal bills?  They are in the majority...

I think I'll keep this simple.

Bill Clinton:  " I did not have sex with that woman "  (peeps, if you think a spouse doesn't have direct imput into a president's life, you are living in a paper bag)

Hillary Clinton:  She claims she came under fire from an investigation in a war zone... you know the story because you saw the video of her casual walk from the helicopter and subsequent walk about the war area.

Barak Obama:  The real Obama is socialist, see his Illinois state Senate records:  he is anti-war, anti-2nd amendment, supports left-wing social issues, supports radical environmental issues:  but then, is he calm, compassionate, ignores his critics, surrounds himself with a knowledgeable team, prolific, & deliberate thinking?

John McCain:  ...

I'm wondering... at least, my mother is wondering this, and she has asked me repeatedly...  who do I think will win the Presidential race this November:  assuming we are talking about three people, sorry, Ron Paul... :/  All right, here it is:  Regardless of how you intend to vote, who do you think will win?  Will John McCain?  Hillary Clinton (and subsequently Bill, sorry, Elaine, bad girl!  bad, bad... you aren't supposed to put in these personal observations!  stop it!)?  Barak... Barack?  Anyway, B. Hussein Obama?

Which of these Hillary?  John?  or Obama?

Remember, forget who you are voting for, just think for a moment:  who do you think is going to win?

I'm just curious is all...

hillary breaking down in tears just before the New Hampshire primary?... did she want to gain sympathy vote?  or was it a true break down?...  Barak?  Huckabee?  McCain?  get out your Kleenex, time to weep... hillary?  you simply are a weak... girl,  subject to your moon cycles, out of control of your emotions unless a doctor prescribes something to control your outbursts... you are concerned with your outer appearance, which is going to definitely decline if you get into office, and you just aren't strong enough to lead America.  leave it to someone like... well, Dr. Congaleezza Rice might be a calm example, i haven't ever seen her rant, rave, sock... well, she hasn't socked any President in the face as far as i know... and she has one whale of a resume... hill?  go open a law office in Arkansas, let Dr. Rice grow into the Presidency.

now, we have known this for years, well, all right, months :) during this 2008 presidential campaign.  MSNBC 'attacked' the Clinton daughter, which in the world of politics, any family member is fair game for personal attacks:  for instance, this blogger believes that a vote for hill is a vote for bill... but in this case, the family member is, albeit she is of legal age, a daughter... which begs the question, C. is a big girl, and may not even read/hear the remark... had this remark been made about a Huckabee 'child' or a McCain 'child', then it would probably be honored with a Pulitzer:  but this is a Clinton, and woe be to anyone who 'dares' to write such 'remarks' about their/her child.  And, at the risk of opening a can of worms by saying this, but since i am a girl, i get to saythis:  this is so typical of a woman, changing her mind constantly on issues (war vs. no war, stem cell vs. no stem cell, illegal vs. legal aliens, abortion vs. pro-life, economy vs. no economy? <-- where does she stand on the economy, does she know the USA has a Budget that is wildly out of control and she is racing to shove it farther up in DEBT by instituting a universal health care system... or has she changed her mind on that?),

but, she gets all pissed off when her daughter's honor is impugned.  guys are all, argh... you s.o.b. (or some such guy word)... guys have much thicker skin, and slough off remarks like this... Hillary sayin' stuff like, "Hillary admits Fox News is Fair"... are you joking?  Fair?  Hill, this is politics, lady!  if you can't take it, get out of the... kitchen!  :p

i just don't think this female is tough enough to play in the Big Leagues... she simply can't sock the Japanese/African Delegate just because they won't stop killing dolphins/stop barbaric female circumcism in the face like she does with bill clinton when they fight behind closed doors...  

now i know all about the famous girls/women throughout history who have led battles, from Deborah (check out the Bible, people), to Joan of Arc, to Elizabeth I (Elizabeth II doesn't count because when the Battle of the Falklands (or Malvinas as they in the UK call it) happened, she was only a titular head of her country), to... Margaret Thatcher had good leaders when she led the UK... to...

well, this is for starters, wonder if this is inflammatory, or truthful... time will tell...

what is going on with this talk radio situation?  is it really true that the federal gov could shut down talk radio with such personages as Limbaugh, Imus, Beck, etc. going down because fed regs will control political talk... does this sound like socialism or communism at it's best?

there is something called a Fairness Doctrine, which requires radio stations to air alternative points of view — a ruse making people leery of airing controversial talk-radio hosts fearing law suits and federal sanctions.

as i understand it, the current talk-radio system allows free speech:  the renewed 'fairness doctrine' will make radio people give 1-minute liberal coverage for every 1-minute conservative:  a costly deal when you think of it... 12 hrs of hearing liberals such as what is going on in Berkeley with the USMarine Corps, and 12 hrs of hearing those supporting the USMarine Corps... ew... ew...